Tuesday, January 3, 2017

The Fish for Peace

 
 
 
The UN resolution passed on December 23, 2016 that demands Israel stop building settlements in the West Bank is troubling to say the least.
 
Israel is defiant and is already planning to build more housing units in East Jerusalem.
 
The adoption of Resolution 2334 is a huge hindrance in attaining the proper way of negotiating peace between the Israelis and the Palestinians.
 
The US chose to abstain from this vote which is something Obama has yet to do during his administration, in allowing a resolution to pass at the Security Council that is critical of Israeli policy.  
 
Since the 1970’s almost every US administration has allowed a resolution that is critical of Israel; even when it came to the construction of settlements.
 
But this time the United States abstained from voting on Security Council Resolution 2334, which allowed it to pass 14-0.
 
This has left Israeli settlement activity in a precarious position; but as said they will defy the UN resolution and have plans to build up to 5,600 units in East Jerusalem.
 
Israel has decided to cutback diplomatic relations with at least a dozen of the countries that voted for the resolution.
 
Israeli sources say that the Obama administration, with John Kerry playing a leading role, is behind the UN Security Council resolution in saying the Israeli settlements are illegal.
 
 
Israel even has evidence that Obama’s administration is behind the wording of the Security Council Resolution 2334.
 
The US State Department denies that the Obama administration had anything to do with this.
 
I would like to see Israel produce the evidence before Obama leaves office, but they say they will hand it over to the Trump administration.
 
That is if President-elect Donald Trump is inaugurated, for there is suspicion that George Soros, Michael Moore and some others will do what they can to not let this happen.
 
The resolution claims Israeli settlements have no legal validity.
 
They claim Israel is building in Palestinian territory that they have occupied since 1967, the Six-Day War, including East Jerusalem, West Bank and the Golan Heights.
 
If you win territory against someone who attacks you, how is that then occupying their property; it never belonged to the Palestinians in the first place.
 
There has never been a Palestinian state.
 
The West Bank temporarily belonged to Jordan and the Golan temporarily belonged to Syria before the Six-Day War; which they lost after attacking Israel.
 
I say that this disputed property temporarily belonged to Jordan and Syria because that land has rightly belonged to Israel ever since God gave it to Abraham, Isaac and Jacob.
 
Israel gained it back during the Six-Day War but the UN somehow thinks Israel is occupying their land.
 
How is that for being deluded?
 
The resolution claims Israel is violating international law and that the settlements are in the way of a two state solution to peace.
 
They call this supposed violation of international law as flagrant, meaning that the building of settlements is obviously offensive.
 
The only thing obviously offensive here is that the United Nations is opposed to the Jewish State and is secretly working to destroy it.
 
Secretary of State, John Kerry, believes that the only way for there to be peace in the Middle East is if Israel discontinues their settlement activity; because it will then allow for the two-state solution to be executed.
 
 
The problem is that the Palestinians are in opposition to a Jewish state anywhere.
 
 
How can Israel work with this open hatred?
 
On January 15, 2017 Paris will be hosting the Middle East peace conference, an action brought forth by François Hollande; the French President.
 
The conference will focus on forcing Israel to give back the land they took from Jordon in the Six-Day War so the Palestinians can then make East Jerusalem their capital.
 
This is the West’s so-called two state solution; dividing Jerusalem.
 
Seventy countries are supposed to be in attendance.
 
Benjamin "Bibi" Netanyahu is not in favour and has clearly rejected Hollande’s international summit, saying he will only meet with President Hollande and Mahmoud Abbas, the Palestinian Authority President, to discuss peace.
 
The seventy countries that will be in attendance will surely be in favour of dividing Jerusalem.
 
Why is France bound and bent to hold this conference at this time when the US is going through a Presidential transition at the end of this week; January 20, 2017?
 
Could it be that maybe this conference is meant to enforce the Oslo agreement, a peace treaty, before Trump officially takes the presidents office?
 
Bible prophecy tells us that the man who implements the peace treaty will be the Antichrist (Dan.9:26b-27).
 
If a Middle East peace treaty comes out of this peace summit it will not be voluntary, but will be forced upon Israel and the Palestinians.
 
A forced peace treaty it will be, either as a result of this Paris peace conference or not,  then the seven year tribulation period will begin the day it is inked on paper.
 
The timing is bad for Israel especially because the UN voted that Israel cannot build more settlements.
 
Many cannot see why the French are being so quick to hold this conference right now, and even at all.
 
But I think many of us know.
 
Will Obama take center stage at this conference since he is the one behind the outcome of Security Council Resolution 2334?
 
My nose tells me that something smells like a pail of rotten fish here, and the French President is trying to broil it up before anyone notices.
 
 
YouTube Video: Israeli Ambassador full speech on UN settlement vote (UNSC Resolution 2334)
Assaf Chriqui
YouTube Video: Netanyahu slams Obama for 'gang up' UN vote
UKRAINE TODAY
YouTube Video: Kerry ‘Violence, settlements, demolitions’ imperiling the vital two state solution
Times of Israel
YouTube Video: The Truth on Israel Palestine Conflict Palestinian Arabs do not want peace 
the false muslim world